By Eric Yu
The work that Schiller
et al. (1995) have produced about transmigrants proves how such a group of
people have a number of complex dimensions that need to be understood to gain
further clarity. These authors (1995) make particular note of how such a group
were people were divided in their loyalties, as they “were in fact immigrants” that
were supposed to sever their connections to home, but actually acted through “transnational
connections of past generations of immigrants” (p. 52). Such a connection bears
similar to how Hu-DeHart (1999) notes the existence of “astronauts” who connect
to family and businesses within both Asian countries and the United States (as
cited by S.C. Wong 1995; Ong 1993). Additionally, the example Schiller et al.
(1995) give about a Filipino family transmigrational life remains surprising,
since these people are able to achieve some degree of success that could have
come at a potential cost. Valverde notes how her research in both Ethnic and
Area studies has allowed her to see such relations invisible to others
(September 29, 2015). One cannot ignore how transmigrants can build bridges
back to their own countries, perhaps even more effectively than other Asian
Americans heavily established in the United States.
Question: How could Asian Americans already heavily established
in the United States communicate effectively to those focused on building
bridges back to their homeland?
Works Cited
Hu-DeHart, E.
(1999). Introduction: Asian American Formations in the Age of Globalization. In
E. Hu-DeHart (Ed.), Across the Pacific:
Asian Americans and globalization (p. 1-28), New York: Asia Society;
Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Schiller et
al. (1995). From Immigrant to Transmigrant: Theorizing Transnational Migration.
Anthropological Quarterly, 68(1),
48-63.
Valverde, K.
C. (2015, September 29). Lecture on Diasporas
(cont.). Personal Collection of K. C. Valverde, University of Davis, Davis
CA.
No comments:
Post a Comment