In Transnational
Migration and the Globalization of Grassroots Politics, one of the main
points that author Michael Peter Smith argues is that one’s politics is
continuously influenced by their connections to their home and homeland. This is a very interesting because I,
myself, see and experience this solitary predicament. The term “reterritorialization” was familiar
especially to my experiences even though I’ve only encountered the word upon
reading. Along with many transnational
migrants and refugees, I identify myself as a displaced person of my country,
with half of my identity taken away by those in power. I try to stay connected with my home country
by becoming part of an ethnic enclave, which is a way to re-create the feeling
of “home” in a foreign country. I
understood a unique meaning of ‘community’ when coming to places like
Chinatown, Japantown, Little Saigon, or Manilatown, which are made to maintain
one’s social practice and memory of home and culture intact. These constructs allowed for an immediate
escape from despair and reality to many displaced people longing to return to their
homeland. And with these thoughts in mind, I sometimes
question myself, would America ever be my home?
Photo Reference: https://thesnapguide.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/74928449-cezvpsaf-img_3841.jpg
Reference: Smith, Michael Peter. "Can You Imagine? Transnational Migration and the Globalization of Grassroots Politics." Social Text, No. 39 (Summer 1994), pp. 15-33
No comments:
Post a Comment