In Louisa Schein’s
article, Diaspora Politics, Homeland Erotics, and the
Materializing of Memory,
she discusses how the displacement of the Hmong community has shaped their
views on gender and sexuality. The article touched on the topic of homeland and
how the Hmong community doesn’t necessarily have a place to call “homeland”. The
author challenges the idea of “homeland”, because the author discussed the idea
that homeland doesn’t necessarily mean a physical place. The Hmong community
were displaced but that has never stopped them from keeping their culture
alive. They established a secretive method that helped keep their system alive,
they have also keep a unique look on their past. Hmong people according to the
article romanticize their past and make it seem better than what it was. Hmong
women according to the article are more outspoken and not afraid to express how
they feel. This has lead to many Hmong men marrying other women like Chinese
women to be specific. Since displacement the Hmong community has changed in
some ways, that have made them stronger but has also weaken them.
Question: There is still uncertainty of what the true
origins are of the Hmong community, so how can they if any go about attaining
their “true” history?
Work Cited: Schein, Louisa. "Diaspora
Politics, Homeland Erotics and the Materializing of Memory." 1999. Positions:
East Asia Cultures Critique7(3): 697-729.
No comments:
Post a Comment