![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhyT7KD-R-ze0-7_lHpJgTbaQk4pF0WKMx29_0Kx7_-1Csb5wMmJMFwdcEyrZYSTmFaZ-MYP5IBLEzOyiUaZrMYHlpOGERbYeCGaG3nbHK_WY6q1kFbCiSDH1NsvPe_vvqznaaOmWaONv0/s320/JamesDu01.jpg)
In bringing both readings from this week together, the Stuart Hall reading, Hall states “Identity is not as transparent or unproblematic as we think” which can be directly tied back to the cultural identity conflict among the Vietnamese Americans highlighted in the Valverde reading. Identity is in fact not transparent at all and very problematic given the divide it can bring to communities when there is a disagreement in what people believe should be the “single cultural identity”. Relating the readings back to the concept of the Asian diaspora, Professor Valverde expresses how “The controversy around Chau’s installation and the Nguoi Viet Daily shows the continued efforts of certain Vietnamese Americans to produce their own reality away from the home country” (Valverde, 100). The reading exhibits the Vietnamese American community with conflicting feelings of displacement, which includes multiple ideas of home and choice, or lack of choice, of a home. ‘Producing their own reality away from the home country’ is leading to the creation of new, shared hybrid cultures. Relating to our own personal experiences, we can examine the pan-Asian identity in America as well as question if there is a divide among the community. For example, we can discuss how the model minority myth affects the Asian-American community and what cultural identity conflicts this myth may be creating among the Asian-Americans that may not necessarily fall under the model minority narrative.
No comments:
Post a Comment