As the class goes into
the interrelations of transmigrations, globalization, and transnationalism,
Michael Peter Smith’s piece made all the concrete linkages to the following
concepts above. He considers the world as a giant space that witnesses
exchanges and flows of people, money, and the politics of emerging imagined
homelands and mobile ethnoscapes. Smith proposes that through the movement of
people via transmigration, “borders” extend its boundaries and it reemerges in
communities where transmigrants recapture the essence of home. In this process,
people create a sense of “bifocality” through their movement of going back and
forth between their homeland and the United States (20). As people move from
spaces to spaces, economic flow goes hand in hand with these movements. The
interconnection of social networks initiates cash remittances in which
stimulates the circulation of money. Smith explored the case of Mexican workers
who goes back and forth to the United States, in their course of traveling and
working, a Mexican border crosser can save up money to buy a house and to
become a middle-class homeowner (21). This proves that regardless of people’s
affixation to one place, for example, their homeland, push and pull factors
motivates people to move and find opportunities in other spaces. Despite the
mobilization of social networks throughout the world, there also seems to be an
emergence of hybrid communities that observes the bifocal cultures in which
thrive and fight to exist in dominant spaces.
In the case of Madison
Nguyen, a San Jose council member whose intention is to highlight her
community’s prospering small-town businesses faced a controversy when the
business district was named Little Saigon. Generations of Vietnamese living in
the city of San Jose felt that naming a business district after Saigon brought
back triggering memories about the fall of Saigon and the thousands of people
who were displaced because of the war. Many felt compelled to rally against her
and urged her to rename the business district to something else other than
“Saigon.” This case study echoes Smith’s conceptualization of borderless
spaces, through the deployment of social networks in various places, people
develop their own bifocals and recapture their own sentiments, struggles, and
deficits in spaces they call home. The Recall Campaign ridiculed council member
Madison Nguyen for not fulfilling her duties as the representative of District
7, San Jose. In the current political climate, especially with the great divide
on people about politics, many are compelled to rally against the current
administration. Democracy plays out when many are feeling repressed and
ignored. However, the role of power in both cases: Recall on Nguyen and
Impeachment for Trump underlines people's power and their struggles to be
fairly represented. This addresses a question on whether we can trust those who
are in power who is supposed to represent us? It seems that with all the news
of harassments, assaults, and corruption, the word “trust” is becoming an
attribute that is close to fiction.
Citations:
Kieu-Linh
Valverde. “Whose Community Is It Anyway?: Overseas Vietnamese Negotiating their
Cultural and Political Identity –The Case of Vice Mayor Madison Nguyen.” Transnationalizing
Viet Nam.
Michael
Peter Smith. “Transnational Migration and the Globalization of Grassroots
Politics.”
“What
Madison Nguyen has done for the District 7, San Jose??” YouTube,
uploaded by Nguyen304, 28 Oct 2008, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeEPZmastjo
No comments:
Post a Comment