Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Week 6 Blog Post: Culture

            In the following series of articles, we will be discussing the practices of cultural art and production, and how the identities expressed are in constant flux and ever-changing due to the current postmodern environment of globalization and transnational networks. Stuart Hall discusses the ways that cultural identity is presented while addressing cultural hybridity, and Caroline Valverde discusses Chau Huynh’s art and how its attempt at cultural hybridity resulted in anti-communist protests that suppress freedom of speech that are not conducive to the mob’s ideology. Finally, with Sunaina Mara’s article, we discuss South Asian American youth and their hybridizing of their cultural traditions with American hip hop ethos, and the desire to fit in both worlds while embracing the positive aspects of both.

Stuart Hall. "Cultural Identity and Diaspora." Reader
 
            In the article “Cultural Identity and Diaspora,”Stuart Hall discusses Caribbean and the “Third Cinema” in relation to the questions about identity, cultural practices, and cultural production. According to Hall, there are two ways of seeing cultural identity. First, identity is a shared and collective history among people of the same ancestry and that it is stable overtime. Second, identity is also seen as unstable and that identity is always developing and transforming. A common belief is that identity is fixed; however, identity is also a production which is always developing through time and culture. Hall claims that it is important to look at forgotten histories, in other words, hidden histories in order to reclaim the cultural identity of Africa. Hall discusses that Africa is the center of our cultural identity; however, many failed to know the meaning and importance of this. Cultural identities have histories, but it overcomes a lot of transformation. Histories is spoken through one’s experience and it is subject to changes due to memory, fantasy, culture and power.
           Hart exemplifies this concept of identity through three “presences” that constitutes the complex Caribbean cultural identities; they are Présence Africaine, Présence Européenne, and Présence Américaine. Présence Africaine “is the site of the repressed.” They are the history of Africa and slavery, hidden in the Caribbean culture.Through the history of revolution, civil rights movement, and reconstruction of identity, the origins of the term “Africa” is no longer there because it has been transformed. Hart talks about this “displaced homeward journey” experience, where one has an imaginary or real cultural identity that they wish to return to. But before they can reach that identity, they go through a long route through Europe and the United States. By the end of their journey, they finish off with a western twist instead of being in their homeland with their traditional music and monuments. Hart explains that it is “by another route” that the African identity has become.Présence Européenne, which is about domination and power becoming a part of our own identity. Présence Américaine is the “New World” where all these different cultures meet to create a new assimilated culture and the history that we know it today. The “New World” represents the beginning of diaspora. Hart describes the term diaspora as an identity of hybridity, where the identities are constantly producing and reproducing through history.

Kieu-Linh Valverde. "Creating Identity, Defining Culture, and Making History from an Art Exhibit: An Unfinished Story: A Tribute to my Mothers'" in Transnationalizing Viet Nam.

In discussing how diaspora impacts cultural identity, and the declaration of cultural identity in both old and new spaces, Kieu-Linh Valverde in “Creating Identity, Defining Culture, and Making History from an Art Exhibit: An Unfinished Story: A Tribute to my Mothers’” looks into the Vietnamese Community and the case of Chau Huynh and the protesting of her work entitled “Pedicure Basin” which appeared in a 2008 edition of the Vietnamese American newspaper called the “Nguoi Viet Daily.” The controversy, of the North and South Vietnamese flag stitched together, resulted in large anti-communist protests over the nature of her work. However, the personal intention of the art was dismissed in favor of courting anti-communist sentiment. The reason for the stitching of two flags together come from Chau’s experience as the daughter of Communist party members, and growing up in an environment that celebrated pro-Communist propaganda, while hiding the truth about what had really gone with the 4.3 million South Vietnamese refugees. Chau came to the United States in 1999 as an international bride, after several years of being in conflict with a South Vietnamese-American, and had constant arguments about their differing ideologies. Since her perspective on the Vietnam War differed greatly from Vietnamese Americans who came in post 1975 with anti communist sentiments, she did not identify with the South Vietnamese women at the nail shop she worked at. However, after coming to learn the truth, she later had to confront her own understanding of the two worlds of Vietnam that do exist. Stitching together the flags was her artistic and symbolic contribution to this methodical epiphany, and came from a place of not meaning to offend, but really in trying to comprehend her life.  In this chapter of her book, Valverde shows us that extremist Vietnamese Americans who are very anti communist obtained political control through cultural control.


Sunaina Maira. "Mixed Desires: Second-Generation Indian Americans and the Politics of Youth Culture" in Displacements.

By protesting Huynh’s “Pedicure Basin” they are able to shape the Vietnamese community and how Vietnamese Americans are perceived. Valverde’s point here is that by dominating the media and news outlet, anti communist groups succeeds in putting fear into the Vietnamese American community and silencing their free speech. These anti communist ideology has censored so many in the Vietnamese American Community, resulting in many Vietnamese Americans being unable to voice their freedom of speech because the fear of being labeled a communist and attacked by the community. This acceptable harassment continued with F.O.B. II: Art Speaks exhibit, ironically an exhibit of 50 Vietnamese artists that was meant to end self-censorship and simultaneously open dialogue from various groups. With an unacceptable showing of communist symbols, the anti-communist protests continued with zeal about what was the ‘wrong’ sentiment to show, while still continuing to ignore the significance of the artwork presented within the community. It later went into rather ugly personal attacks, using patriarchy and slurs such as ‘con di’ or whores to describe the women who ran the exhibit, showing that the cultural control that is required to keep an appropriate, homogeneous form of view regarding Vietnamese communism.

Other incidents that were similar to Chau Huynh’s case were the 1999 Hi tek protest, and the case of Kim Oanh Lam Nguyen being fired as superintendent of Westminster’s School District where Kim Oanh she was fired shortly after being hired because people from the Vietnamese American community had label her as a Communist. Valverde sees that these tactics are currently the predominant type of political actions in the Vietnamese Diaspora community. Valverde suggests that these incidents might be signs that the Vietnamese American community today is at a crossroad, more and more people like Huynh are attempting to challenge the  dominance of the anti communist ideology, in order to grasp the complexity of their existence, rather than running high on anti-communism sentiment.

            In trying to comprehend homeland and new traditions, Sunaina Maira’s article describes the experiences of South Asian American youth who struggles to define notions of authenticity that work to position these youth in relation to hierarchies of race, class, gender, and nationalism that mark them as “local” in America. At the same time, they want to include a transnational imaginings of India or their homeland. They do this by incorporating popular culture music hip-hop into India’s music to evoke a sense of “place” in a social hierarchy. In conjunction with the production of remix music, the youth constructs a culturally hybrid style, such as wearing Indian-style nose rings and bindis with hip-hop fashion, and dancing in traditional folk dance gestures while gyrating to club mixes.

          According to Maira, popular culture is a critical site for understanding the ways the youth position themselves in the landscape of ethnic and racial politics, because we see ethnic authenticity, cultural hybridization, racialized gender ideologies, and class contradictions. The youth thinks that it is “cool,” which also implies that they have racialized and classified  themselves in the United States. Popular culture offers youth to re-appropriate or symbolically transgress existing racial, gendered, and class boundaries. The second-generation youth are able to socialize with ethnic peers while reinterpreting Indian musical and dance traditions using American popular culture. The hip-hop culture is mostly adopted by middle-class/white/suburban youth, as well as Asian American, Latino, and white youth from the urban.

           Since most Indians lived in urban or suburban (cities), this fits them in the same “local” category. Hip-hop also expresses sexuality for women and men, but for Indian women the female “hoochi” outfits for nightclubs are against their Indian cultural beliefs of Chastity, but expresses femininity in America. For the men, the male black hip-hop style is machismo in the U.S. This is why the South Asian youth flaunt hip-hop styles while incorporating some Indian accessories and details.The hip hop culture alienates them from their parents or as a symbol of rebellion from their parents’ expectations. This alienation from their parents help make them “cool” like the youth in America, because they do not want to be classified as full Indians. They want to also feel belonging to the American culture. She argued that the cultural forms that responses to diasporic or transnational experiences take cannot be understood only in terms of the nature of migration but also be 
understood in terms of relationships to local cultural and political economies.  

Questions:
1. Do you believe that under-covering hidden histories is the solution to cultural identities? Why?

2. Why do you think the Vietnamese Americans that are anticommunist are so vocal? Do they really represent the voice of the Vietnamese Americans?

3. Does hip hop culture influence other Asian American minority group as well? What does this hybridization of the culture mean?

4. According to Hart, what are ways to see identity? How does cultural identity form overtime?
5. In the discussion of anti-communist sentiment towards Huynh's art, what do you suggest to be a way to open dialogue about the presence of communism in the Vietnamese diaspora's person's past? More specifically, what is a possible solution, if the dialogue about art, war, and politics is currently at a standstill for not being able to transcend such ideology wars? 

Blog 6 by: Gaukue Xiong, Shoun Thao, Fanny Wong, Susan Xiong, Iris Xie

No comments:

Post a Comment